"Voldemort is the villain actively seeking to destroy his enemies. He sets the plot in motion and constantly provokes the events of which it consists. This is why he resembles the "villain-hero" typical of the Gothic novel of the 18th and 19th century. He is Propp's villain and hero at the same time."
Muggles, Monsters and Magicians. A Literary Analysis of the Harry Potter
Series, by Claudia Fenske, p. 153.
I might be mistaken, but isn't it usually the villain who seeks to destroy his enemies and plots? Why is Voldemort special, then? Or is Sauron a "villain-hero" in Gothic fashion, too?
Besides, I rather thought the Gothic "villain-hero" was supposed to be Snape. Joyce Millman even points out, in her essay in
Mapping the World of Harry Potter, that Snape's description resembles that of Ann Radcliffe's Italian monk Schedoni.
Did I miss something?
Of course,
Mapping the World of Harry Potter isn't really an academic work on Harry Potter, like Ms Fenske's work. But that doesn't change the fact that Snape looks like the Gothic villain, and with the development of DH even fits the type of character that the Gothic villain developed into, namely the Mr Rochesters and Heathcliffs of the Bronte sisters.
Plus, Ms Fenske claims that "[o]nly in his last year does James change [...] and falls in love with Lily Evans." (p. 245). Which is so blantantly
not correct that I prefer to not believe anything else she tells me.
So there. Voldemort is
not the Gothic "villain-hero".
Which makes me feel disgustingly smug and superior, but doesn't help me finding secondary literature on Harry Potter that I can actually quote. Some scholars they are.